60%sold to the ESOP
40%kept by the continuing shareholders
$0in personal guarantees
2025closed in December, on the retiring shareholder's deadline

The situation

One owner ready to retire, the others ready to keep building

Access Electric Supply was founded in 1991 in Kent, Washington. It's a nationwide electrical distributor serving commercial, industrial, government, utility, and aftermarket customers.

The company competes on technical expertise, manufacturer relationships, and creative sourcing that cuts schedule risk on complex projects, including hyperscale data centers.

One shareholder wanted to retire by year-end. The continuing partners wanted some liquidity without giving up control. They needed one structure that did both, on a compressed timeline.

Where the business sells

  • Data centers. Hyperscale power distribution equipment.
  • Industrial. Custom switchgear and control solutions.
  • Utility and government. Substation upgrades and retrofits.

What the owners wanted

Two sets of goals, one deal

The retiring shareholder

  • Full retirement by year-end
  • High certainty of closing
  • A fast timeline

The continuing shareholders

  • Partial liquidity
  • Keep 40% of the equity
  • Keep operational control
  • Keep the company independent

What made it hard

Four problems the deal had to solve

A lean workforce and IRS Section 415

With a small employee base, the allocations needed careful testing to meet IRS limits.

A year-end deadline

The deal had to close in a short window to meet the retiring shareholder's December 2025 deadline.

No personal guarantees

Most of the senior financing was set up without personal guarantees from the continuing owners.

C corp now, S corp later

The ESOP started in a C corporation, with a clear path to grow the employee base and convert later.

How the deal was built

The ESOP bought 60% in a leveraged transaction

Senior debtWaFd Bank

A senior term loan, the majority of the structure.

Seller financingSeller notes

About 40% seller financing, with warrants.

Retained equity40% ownership

The continuing shareholders keep full board control.

IncentivesManagement SARs

A stock appreciation rights plan to be set up.

The alternative

ESOP vs. private equity

ConsiderationPrivate equityLeveraged ESOP
OwnershipMajority control to the sponsor60% sold, 40% kept by shareholders
GovernanceBoard control shifts to the sponsorShareholders keep board influence
LiquidityFull exit or majority recapPartial liquidity now, a possible second stage later
HorizonDefined 3 to 7 year exitLong-term ownership
EmployeesPotential restructuring riskBroad-based employee ownership
CapitalSponsor-driven leverageStructured for operating flexibility
GuaranteesNo personal guaranteesNo personal guarantees

How it came out

What the owners got

  • The retiring shareholder closed on schedule in December 2025
  • The continuing partners took cash out and kept 40%
  • The ESOP meets IRS Section 415 rules
  • Bank financing with no personal guarantees
  • The company stays independent, with the same leadership
We were able to align with the Board of Directors as a truly unbiased advisor throughout the entire process and negotiate a fair outcome that suited all parties' needs.

Brandt Brereton, General Partner, Perpetuate Capital

CASE STUDYAccess Electric SupplyPERPETUATE CAPITAL

The full case study

Get the full case study

The page above is the short version. Enter your email below and the download button appears right here. It's a 5-page PDF.

What's in the PDF

  • The capital structure: senior debt, seller notes, retained equity
  • How the deal met IRS Section 415 with a small workforce
  • The ESOP vs. private equity comparison
  • The road map from C corp to S corp
  • Everyone who worked on the deal

Questions about a deal like this?

Brandt Brereton, General Partner · +1 775-491-8357 · brandt@perpetuatecapital.com

Email Brandt